Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sailor, W.
Right arrow Articles by Paul, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Framing Positive Behavior Support in the Ongoing Discourse Concerning the Politics of Knowledge

Wayne Sailor

University of Kansas, w-sailor{at}ku.edu

James L. Paul

University of South Florida

In this article, the authors examine the contributions of a progressive form of postmodern social theory to raising substantive issues about the politics of knowledge or the factors that govern decision processes regarding the nature of evidence from research. They examine the basis for the reaction against postmodernism that has appeared in the special education literature to date and, in particular, question whether it collectively represents a reasoned defense of the scientific basis for inquiry. The authors call attention to a confusion that occurs in these reactive positions between postmodernism on the one hand and subjectivism (i.e., qualitative research methods) in the production of knowledge on the other, which, like positivism (i.e., empirical methods), is a modern epistemology. They suggest that positive behavior support, because of its inherent pragmatism and multimethod focus on valued outcomes for people with disabilities, may offer a practice-focused forum for more productive conversations about multiple warrants, or justifying reasons, for alternative approaches to inquiry.

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, Vol. 6, No. 1, 37-49 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/10983007040060010601


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
W. Sailor, M. J. Stowe, H. Rutherford Turnbull, and P. J. Kleinhammer-Tramill
A Case for Adding a Social Behavioral Standard to Standards-Based Education With Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support as Its Basis
Remedial and Special Education, December 1, 2007; 28(6): 366 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]