Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts-Gwinn, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Identification of Competing Reinforcers for Behavior Maintained by Automatic Reinforcement

Michelle M. Roberts-Gwinn

Gonzaga University

LeAnn Luiten

Gonzaga University

K. Mark Derby

Gonzaga University

Tania A. Johnson

Gonzaga University

Kimberly Weber

Gonzaga University

A four-phase investigation was completed to reduce aberrant behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement. During Phase 1, a brief functional analysis determined the maintaining contingencies for aberrant behavior displayed by an 11-year-old boy with autism. The results of this analysis suggested that aberrant behavior was maintained by automatic reinforcement. During Phase 2, the participant was exposed to a series of different types of sensory stimuli. Noncontingent exposure to kinesthetic stimuli was shown to decrease aberrant behavior to near zero levels. Conversely, noncontingent exposure to auditory and visual stimuli did not decrease aberrant behavior. This combination of results suggested that noncontingent access to kinesthetic stimuli competed with the reinforcing effects of aberrant behavior. We hypothesized that kinesthetic stimuli served as substitutable reinforcers to the automatic reinforcement provided by aberrant behavior. We further hypothesized that, if this is the case, kinesthetic stimuli should also contain reinforcing properties for the acquisition of a competing response topography. This hypothesis was evaluated during Phases 3 and 4 in which contingent access to kinesthetic stimuli was shown to increase a competing response topography during short- and long-term treatment.

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, Vol. 3, No. 2, 83-87 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/109830070100300204
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?